Comment

Comment on Does anyone else find it suspicious that there wasn't any criticism on here about Stop Killing Games until after it hit 1.4M signatures?

<- View Parent

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

Dr. K

This one? He sounds like an awesome dude according to his bio, but I’ve never seen anything by him, I’ll check him out.

And I haven’t seen any conversations between him and Ross. I did see snippets of his original reaction, where he seemed to completely misunderstand the petition, and his follow-up, unhinged rant, but I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on the latter because he had apparently gotten a lot of negative attention (swatting attempts, calls for him to leave the publisher he was at, and random negative remarks on his own games), so I think it’s quite possible his attack on Ross was an emotional reaction to that negative attention, and not level-headed attack on Ross (I’ve seen nothing to suggest Ross is anything other than an awesome guy).

So my opinion on PirateSoftware is relatively neutral. He seems to be on the better end of the streamer range, which isn’t saying much (lots of popular streamers are pretty toxic). I don’t think he’s anyone to look up to, and I wish he’d either have Ross on to discuss the petition or thoroughly read and understand it so he can elucidate his opposition to it, both of which I think would be helpful for his audience to form an actual opinion instead of borrowing his. But maybe he’s on the worse end of that spectrum, I don’t know, since again, I’ve only watched a few minutes of his content and he seemed like your average streamer who exaggerates their credentials and leans into “content,” and I’m not surprised clowning on people is part of that.

I literally had not heard of him a month ago, so I’m missing a ton of context. However, nothing I’ve seen makes me want to watch more of his content (he’s definitely not my style), but nothing makes me think he should be “cancelled” or whatever. Aside from some offensive remarks, I don’t think he’s really hurting anyone.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
The (alleged) swatting didn’t happen before “The End Of SKG”.
I also don’t think he deserves cancellation, but he has lied so many times, so confidently and so unrepentantly that he deservers very little credibility.

I understand that some people would feel sympathy for the somewhat excessive negative attention he got (not from me, he lost my sympathy the first time I saw him blatantly lying and lobbing insults) but with the way he ALWAYS behaved, he absolutely had some of it coming.

source
- sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  
  excessive negative attention
  
  Yeah, that’s basically what I’m pushing back on. The internet community loves to jump on people and dig up random dirt when they do something unpopular, and a lot of that dirt is exaggerated if not completely fabricated. Look at the response to the Godot tweet about being “woke” for an example of that (which PS rightly defended Godot for).
  
  He may be a POS, but I don’t think he deserves what he got. He deserves to be less popular, sure, but not much more than that.
  
  source
9bananas@feddit.org ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
he’s repeatedly refused to talk to ross;

after the first video pirate software uploaded about SKG, ross left a comment offering clarifications and a chance to talk about the petition and surrounding misconceptions.

ross was refused an answer.

then PS uploaded more videos, and streams, with even more misinformation.

ross ignored it at that point and just continued doing his thing, advocating for the petition, giving updates, etc.

then it looked like the petition would fail, so ross decided there’s nothing left to lose by talking about the drama with PS, and lo and behold, suddenly all youtubers and streamers were suuuper onboard, helped spread the drama, and as a consequence SKG reached its goal… because of the drama.

so a net positive overall, but sad that it’s only because drama sells ads on streaming and video sites…really just a dumb state of affairs…

and to be clear: ross wasn’t at all vindictive in his video. frustrated by the situation, yes, but ultimately it was a very fair and sober response.

highly recommend checking it out; from what you said so far, i think you’ll enjoy the level-headed approach ross took!

here’s a link to the vid

source
- sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  
  he’s repeatedly refused to talk to ross;
  
  Yeah, and that’s what disappoints me the most. I think suck a conversation could be productive and really suss out where PirateSoftware is coming from. Maybe there’s more to it, but w/o that conversation, it just seems like he misread it and is doubling down relying on whatever meager credentials he has. That’s sad, because I’m sure he absorbed something useful in his years working w/ game devs.
  
  helped spread the drama
  
  And honestly, that makes me want to watch those other streamers less. I used to watch SomeOrdinaryGamers, but him repeatedly getting into YT drama (and claiming he didn’t like it) turned me off, and now he’s apparently back on that same trend. I’m sure those other YTers have decent takes, but I just really don’t like all that drama.
  
  Ross’ petition should succeed because it’s a good petition, and that’s obvious from the text of the petition. It doesn’t need YTers to create a bunch of drama about it.
  
  ross wasn’t at all vindictive in his video
  
  Yeah, Ross is a stand-up dude. He made a big deal about not wanting to get into drama, but that he’d do whatever was necessary, and the result was a very reasonable rebuttal. I’d like to buy him a beverage of his choice, he seems awesome.
  
  source
  - 9bananas@feddit.org ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    where PirateSoftware is coming from
    
    see, I’m afraid it’s simply down to money.
    
    so I’m not convinced it would be all that productive to talk to ross.
    
    he made the assertion, without evidence, that the petition would kill live service games, and then based everything else on that flawed premise.
    
    it has been explained to him that this is not the case, multiple times over.
    
    he, as an ex blizzard employee amd avid WoW player, should know exactly just how popular private servers for WoW are (used to be? haven’t played in about 10 years, but used to play a lot on warmane myself).
    
    that makes his takes especially weird, since that’s a perfect example of how game preservation for live service games could look like! (although I’m sure corporate was ‘not amused’ by those servers at all…)
    
    this implies to me, that his motives are not at all honorable.
    
    the most likely explanation, which is entirely speculation on my part, is simply fear of missing out on profits, if he ever gets his game out.
    
    or that creating his game is going to take so long (cause he spends all his time streaming instead of working on his game), that he’ll basically have to start over, since by that point he probably will have to comply with the new regulations, eating into his profits.
    
    imho: doesn’t really matter what his motivations are, because his opinions are harmful to everyone enjoying games, period. and that, weirdly enough, includes himself!
    
    so I’m not very optimistic on this point, but i would like to be wrong!
    
    at least that would most likely be, because there’s a more interesting explanation…
    
    And honestly, that makes me want to watch those other streamers less.
    
    I’m the same!
    
    drama turns me off content creators, not the other way around…
    
    (i only know about the drama, because so much has been showing up in the recommendations under the videos i do watch…i have watched exactly none of the drama/reaction videos)
    
    the problem with the streamer/yt drama machine i have specifically, is that all the creators that jumped on that particular wagon were dead silent on the initiative in the first place.
    
    and that’s the real tragedy: a whole group of people, whose livelihoods, even if they don’t necessarily depend on games, are very much enhanced by them a LOT, did fuckall to support the initiative. nothing.
    
    …until they saw an opportunity to profit off the drama!
    
    THAT’S what gets me!
    
    these are all people that are supposedly (and i really do believe largely honestly) passionate about games!
    
    …until it might eat into their profits to share something that would benefit them AND their audience.
    
    the utter lack of solidarity is what really turns me off about these people…
    
    (well…in addition to everything else about streamers… I don’t like streamers very much in general…never understood the appeal…)
    
    It doesn’t need YTers to create a bunch of drama about it.
    
    yeah, but this point is an issue with the outrage-based economy of online content, not this particular case…
    
    sucks in it’s entirety, but until we manage to decouple content from ad revenue we’re stuck with it.
    
    only solution i see is to declare the internet a utility (which it obviously IS, but try telling that to the money people…)
    
    source
    sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    But what’s his profit motive? He makes mediocre indie games and did some undefined work (probably publicity) at an indie publisher. I don’t see any material change to him financially whichever way the petition goes. He’s kinda popular, but far from a big influencer.
    
    That argument doesn’t make a ton of sense to me.
    
    fear of missing out on profits, if he ever gets his game out.
    
    This doesn’t make much sense. The obligations only kick in once the game gets shut down, so either he makes so much that it doesn’t matter (can keep running the servers for a long time) or it doesn’t sell well and he just releases server binaries and cuts his losses. Even in the worst case (his misunderstanding), releasing server sources isn’t an issue for a failed game, and a small cost to pay for a very lucrative one.
    
    I think he’s just an opinionated guy who sticks with his initial impression, even if it’s wrong, and will oppose anything that sounds inconvenient for game devs (what he sees himself as). That’s sadly really common, people seem to love jumping to conclusions and only really dig in if the easy assumption negatively impacts them.
    
    all the creators that jumped on that particular wagon were dead silent on the initiative in the first place.
    
    Exactly! But honestly, that should be expected because their entire job is to get views.
    
    The only one I kinda like on this subject is Gamers Nexus, because they actually approach it like journalists instead of just reacting to headlines. They’ll interview companies and people to get both sides before making a hit piece. Even then, GN can rub me the wrong way when they pursue something too far.
    
    never understood the appeal…
    
    Same. I watch only a handful:
    
    FlorryWorry - he’s the best at EU4 and goes deep into the mechanics; I’ve become a much better player from watching his videos
    
    MTG draft streamers (NumotTheNummy, LSV, NicolaiBolas) - great at explaining plays and picks
    
    Hikaru Nakamura - chess streamer, second in the world, good at explaining plays
    
    Notice a pattern? I watch people who are better than me at a game so I can learn to be better myself. I don’t watch action game streamers, mostly strategy games.
    
    I’ll occasionally watch YT videos when I either don’t have time to play a game, or I am stuck and need help getting through a section.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments