Comment on Independent MP to push for lowering of Australian voting age
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day agoI don’t think suggesting younger teenagers be allowed to vote is “culture war bullshit”. It certainly wouldn’t do her any favours considering that young people tend to overwhelmingly vote for left parties.
MisterFrog@aussie.zone 1 day ago
This is fair, my language is perhaps a little strong. Still a distraction in my opinion.
Teenagers are in school, and many are very knowledgeable and engaged.
But I don’t really think there is much need to change the voting age
Ilandar@lemmy.today 19 hours ago
What is actually wrong with the proposal, though? Or are you simply objecting because the idea came from “the other side”, even though The Greens have been pushing this since 2018?
MisterFrog@aussie.zone 11 hours ago
I’m not necessarily opposed, but beyond “they deserve a say in their future” I’m not really sure what the argument for it is.
There’s a lot of learning that goes on between the ages of 16 and 18. Like the level of stuff you’re learning accelerates quite a lot.
While education isn’t a pre-requisite for voting, we gotta set a line somewhere. 18 is the line we’ve set for a bunch of other things.
I would need more convincing that this line should be changed.
Ilandar@lemmy.today 10 hours ago
You’re right, education is not a prerequisite. Neither is intelligence, or brain development, or familiarity with the political system, or any of the other tired old arguments right wingers repeat. No one 18 and upwards is tested against any of these metrics when they first enrol. 16 year olds can leave school (in some states), drive on public roads, work a regular full time week and pay taxes. These are all things that clearly distinguish them from children 15 and under, and someone who can legally do all of those things alongside adults obviously deserves the right to vote alongside us too.
It’s quite ironic really that you were the one who tried to frame this as a right wing culture war issue, and yet your position is that of Pauline Hanson, leader of THE right wing culture war party in this country.
pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
If teenagers are well educated and know how to make a good decision that supports there views then I don’t see why they shouldn’t be able to vote.
Younger people voting for there future is better.
MisterFrog@aussie.zone 11 hours ago
Education isn’t a pre-requisite for voting, but unless we’re planning on fundamentally changing how we treat 16 to 18 year olds (which I’m in favour of, by the way), I don’t see why 16 should be the new arbitrary age we choose.
Why not 14?
18 is the arbitrary age we’ve already chosen to confer adulthood.
And when I was 16, I felt much the same way. I had my opinions, and I wouldn’t have been against being given the vote. But we also don’t let 16 year olds drive. Should we let them do that too?
Honestly, I dunno.
16 year olds aren’t stupid, but we just gotta pick some arbitrary line where we think the average person has had enough life experience to be entrusted with voting.
And honestly, it’s probably a good thing for people to have the chance of being more numerate and literate via schooling in year 11 and 12, or in a trade or TAFE before they start voting.
Learning accelerates (at least, in my experience) a lot in those last years of secondary schooling.
I’m not necessarily against changing it. I just very dislike Monique Ryan because she hates working people (fact, not opinion, since she’s voted against criminalising wage theft), and think this is somewhat a distraction from the economic woes which this kind of ideology produces.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 hours ago
Yeah, you probably wouldn’t see much need for it if you aren’t sixteen. Meanwhile, if you were, you’d probably be sitting there wondering why the rest of us keep fluffing up the climate that you’d have to live with.
MisterFrog@aussie.zone 11 hours ago
When I was 16 I also didn’t see much of a need for it (this topic is raised every couple of years). Even though I was much more engaged with politics than the average person at that age, at the time.
I’m not saying 16 year olds are unqualified to vote, but we gotta draw the line somewhere.
Adulthood isn’t totally arbitrary because of how we’ve structured our society (though, the age at which this is, depends on when people are leaving school/are legally defined as independent).
The reason I think this is a distraction is because this has been suggested time and time again, and it’s not likely to get off the ground and it wouldn’t make huge swings in voter numbers.
I dunno. As in my edited comment, I just think Monique Ryan is a wanker, who I happen to agree with on wanting to do something urgently about the climate.
small44@piefed.social 11 hours ago
We can draw the line with 16 years since it's backed by science
https://www.unicef.ca/sites/default/files/2024-06/UNICEF%2520_Canada_Policy_Brief_Bill_S-201_Lowering_the_Voting_Age.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiCkN_gg8mOAxV1rYkEHdIBCTcQFnoECCEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw03bDD_PZX8T-bCQ4v3zcPx
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 hours ago
You also talked about, in that comment, the age all other things are defined as adulthood, but that’s not even clear. Contract law says 18, unless you qualify for unreasonable to live at home, where you can sign contracts at 16. The driving age is 17 in several states. Medical privacy takes effect at 15. Age of consent nationwide is 16 (as long as the other person doesn’t have a duty of care over you). So there’s already a lot of precedent for a younger age of adulthood.
When I was 16, I was politically involved and I wanted to be able to vote. You could say that anything you’re not motivated to care about is a distraction. Plenty of things are tried again in politics as the world progresses. That’s like saying we should give up on climate change.