Of course, that’s why we need better guidelines. It’s like beauty ads that have to declare they used Photoshop. Every photo is edited if you don’t make it clear what you mean
But it has meaning to some consumers. Not everyone can tell that an image has been majorly edited or created using a program created to replicate pictures
qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Of course, that’s why we need better guidelines. It’s like beauty ads that have to declare they used Photoshop. Every photo is edited if you don’t make it clear what you mean
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 month ago
Why should something not be disclosed just because its common?
ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It builds indifference to the disclaimer when it’s too general. The California cancer label is a good example.
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 month ago
But its not too general. Steam allows you to give a description of the use of AI
qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I didn’t say that. It should be more specific to have any meaning to the consumer.
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 month ago
But it has meaning to some consumers. Not everyone can tell that an image has been majorly edited or created using a program created to replicate pictures
vithigar@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 month ago
Even if it is ignored by a lot of people, its better than not knowing at all
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Because I don’t think anybody actually cares that much if you use small pieces of AI code. What people don’t want is everything being AI produced.
Right now though the AI tag is been applied to both scenarios with no distinction.
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 month ago
But there is a difference
Steam allows you to describe how you used AI
childOfMagenta@jlai.lu 1 month ago
Yeah, I suspect the AI tag should apply to even more games then.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Hence the problem