Using -10 - 40 as a range of temperatures experienced by humans makes way less sense than 0 - 100. We’re a base 10 species so it’s much better for regular use.
Metric aficionados rightly point out that the other measures are all nicely base 10, so why doesn’t that argument hold for temperature too? Celsius is inferior.
slowwooderrunsdeep@lemmy.world 8 months ago
American here too… I’m totally OK with switching to metric as long as we keep Fahrenheit for weather. It just makes so much more sense.
echodot@feddit.uk 8 months ago
Celsius is an absolute measurement of a physical phenomenon, and can be tested to check its validity. Fahrenheit is a measurement of what some person a long time ago personally feel like at the time, and it’s not even accurate for most humans.
vector_zero@lemmy.world 8 months ago
IMO it’s not even about something making sense, we’re just very accustomed to fahrenheit, so it feels more natural to us.
I’ll be the first to admit that I have no idea about what’s warm and cold in Celsius. I know 0 is quite cold, 20 is room temperature, and 100 is near instant death.
Senex@reddthat.com 8 months ago
Otherwise known as Dallas, Texas.
echodot@feddit.uk 8 months ago
20 is a hot room, 15 is room temperature
10 - 30 is average for most weather in moderate parts of the world 5 - 10 is it cold night <3 and you have snow 50 would be a desert
Lokoschade@feddit.de 8 months ago
15°C is way too cold as room temperature, 18 - 20°C is the minimum at which I’m comfortable
trk@aussie.zone 8 months ago
How does it make more sense??? They’re both just numbers in a scale, but at least one had a useful couple of data points.
mysoulishome@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m ok with Fahrenheit but would just make it easier if the whole world used the same, so I’d be cool with switching.