Comment on Elon offers Wikipedia $ 1 billion to change their name to Dickipedia

Carighan@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

• Phen@lemmy.eco.br ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

  He doesn’t need to pay. Twitter is already worth less than the debt, if he continues to break that company apart there’ll he no reason to even consider paying the debt off.

  source

  • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    The debt is a tax writeoff. The entire company is a tax writeoff for him and his clique.

    This will allow them to gain billions more without spending a cent in taxes.

    source

    • stevehobbes@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      Tell me you don’t understand taxes without telling me you don’t understand taxes.

      youtu.be/XEL65gywwHQ?si=KcjWj3xXtg2un4h7

      source

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

        Tell me you don't understand that its exactly what Trump did.

        source
      • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [bot] ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

        Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

        https://piped.video/XEL65gywwHQ?si=KcjWj3xXtg2un4h7

        Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

        I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

        source
  • stevehobbes@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

    That’s not how debt works, he almost certainly pledged assets and a personal guarantee against it. This is known as collateral.

    The banks take the collateral when you stop paying.

    source

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

      The way I understood it is that he didn’t get a loan to buy the company, but had a bank itself buy Twitter as a loan, so Twitter itself is the collateral. That’s what I did when I bought my apartment: a bank bought it from the constructor and let me live in it while slowly buying it from them over hundreds of installments. If I stopped paying the bank would kick me out and sell the apartment to someone else.

      source

      • stevehobbes@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

        That isn’t quite right. If you stopped paying the bank would kick you out and sell the apartment to someone else, but if they get less than you owe them for it, they will also send you a bill for the remainder.

        And then sue you to get that money.

        Interestingly, if they get more than you owe them for it, they will cut you a check for the difference.

        But you are actually wrong about how and what the order of operations is.

        You are buying the house, the lender (bank) writes the check directly to the seller, and you sign a mortgage agreement for that much with the bank and they put a lien on your house. The bank does not own the house, you do. The bank owns a promissory note from you, backed by your personal wealth and credit and the value of the house (that they have a lien on).

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago

        If you tear down the apartment, you cannot stop paying with the excuse that now it worths nothing. You’d still need to pay the original value

        source