Comment

I have no idea what that actually proves, as I could just as easily mess with the gimp screenshot in, say… gimp… (or I suppose ask GPT to make a gimp screenshot?) but here you go. Image

source

Sort:hotnew top

ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I just wanted to see if you’d actually go out of your way to fake a gimp screenshot. The guy has 17 fingers and 3 arms and the baby has 14 toes and one hand is meshing into the arm of the man. It’s AI. The screenshot also doesn’t have a layer for most things that would have layers like the text that says “Yoink” and for some reason the baby is half in one layer and half another. The checkered pattern in the layer view is messed up. Why would you go to such lengths to lie? Just say it’s AI. It’s obvious.

source
- xia@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I don’t know what you think I’m claiming. I just mashed some images together, I never said I took them with a camera. FYI: The screenshot is legit. Also, you might be interested to learn about “merge down”, it really helps with layer management. docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/gimp-layer-merge-down.html
  
  source
  - ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    How’d you get it to do this?
    
    Image
    
    source
    xia@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    By using the software as intended. I guess I could file a bug report, but I think it’s hilarious that you think I spent a bunch of time compositing a gimp screenshot to that level of detail, but refuse to believe I would spend even a few seconds compositing the original (with obvious 3rd arm and poorly colored zig-zag join points).
    
    source
- FelixCress@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  He did:
  
  lemmy.sdf.org/comment/21271387
  
  source