That’s from the UK? I don’t think you can extrapolate UK driving data to the US. Roads and car use don’t compare at all.
Comment on This is the dumbest idea ever
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 week ago
This is your regular reminder that it’s generally not older people who are high-risk drivers: …publishing.service.gov.uk/…/02-image-2.svg
Drivers get safer until about 70, and only get less safe than your average young driver when over 86.
There is a perception that older drivers are an absolute liability on the roads, which I can only assume stems from impatient people who get frustrated when stuck behind an older driver going more slowly than they’d like.
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 week ago
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 week ago
In the absence of forthcoming data (hint hint), what factors do you think differ between the UK and USA which affect the ability of very old/very young drivers?
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 week ago
Car dependency mainly. A 65yo in the UK that dosen’t feel physically capable of driving can still have an independent live, using public transit or walking. In the US you depend on cars for everything.
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That doesn’t affect the ability of older drivers, only the number of them.
In fact, since one reason very old drivers might get more accident prone is because they stop driving as much and lose some of the skills, you would expect that, if older Americans really persist in driving more as they get older (you haven’t provided any evidence that they do) they would retain those skills and be less accident prone, not more, so would be safer, and less at need of re-tests, than their UK counterparts.
Focusing on the driving safety of the elderly is a classic example of Saliency Bias. A 20-year old kid wrecking his car is nothing unusual so you don’t remember it when thinking about safety. An 80 year old who can’t even remember which way to turn the wheel getting in a wreck is unusual and extreme, so it’s more salient. Getting stuck behind an elderly driver gives you the impression that they’re a bad and hence unsafe driver, which contributes to this.
grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
I wonder if raising the licencing age to 25 would reduce the curve or just shift it to the right
Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Not every 70 YO is the same health. Some can barely see at that age, or at night. There are also plenty of health issues or medications taken at this age which could affect reactions or alertness. Not saying it can’t happen to the young, but it’s far more prevalent.
inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 week ago
You’re arguing against factual stats with some kind of generic “old people have old people problems sometimes” ?
Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yes. The young are reckless causing most of their accidents. We do what we can to prevent those accidents, seems like we could do a lot more. The old have accidents from health issues, we can definitely do more than just hoping their kids take the keys away before it’s too late. One idea is regular driver’s tests starting at a certain age.
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Fact is that if you want to spend some money, time or political capital on improving road safety, targeting older drivers is not where you should focus your efforts. The fact that it frequently is, is due to ageism.