Comment on Virgin Physicists

ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• lnxtx@feddit.nl ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  +/-15 %? Good enough!

  source

  • rikudou@lemmings.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If it fits, great! If it doesn’t, you didn’t use enough tape.

    source

    • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      A failed inspection is just an invitation to use a different method until it passes.

      source
  • TheTurner@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    As a calibration technician, this makes me hurt. Lol.

    source
  • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    pi == 3

    source
  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Cringes in Monte Carlo.

    source
• nomecks@lemmy.wtf ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Pi is roughly 5.

  source

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Never, in any engineering field, have I EVER seen anyone simplify pi to 5. For that matter, I have never seen anyone simplify to 3. It is always 3.14. I feel like pi simplification is a weird meme that people think engineers do but is never practiced anywhere.

    It’s like if there was a meme about chefs saying they always replace eggs with grapefruit. No they don’t, and it’s nonsense to think they do.

    source

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      There’s less and less reason to do it (and it’s never 5). On systems without floating point you might want to do round it a bit, but only if the specific thing you’re doing allows it, and even then you’re more likely to do a fixed-point approach by using e.g. 314 and dividing by 100 later, or adjusting that value a bit so you can divide by 128 via bitshift if you’re on a chip where division is expensive. However, in 2025 you almost certainly should have picked a chip with an FPU if you’re doing trigonometry.

      And while rounding pi to 3 or 4 is certainly just a meme, there are other approximations which are used, like small-angle approximations, where things like sin(x) can be simplified to just x for a sufficiently small x.

      source
    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      For back-of-the-envelope or mental calculations, pi is often 3 or 10^(1/2).

      The latter is better than 1% accurate, and has nice properties when doing order-of-magnitude/log space calculations in base 10.

      source
    • Kaboom@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      There’s a lot of weird stereotypes out there that make no sense. Like the whole “programmers wear thigh high socks” thing. Where did that even come from?

      source

      • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Bet that one was started by all those dastardly programmers that wear knee high socks!

        source
    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      you’ve never seen anybody simplify it to 3 when doing head calcs without a phone nearby?

      it doesn’t happen often, in fact I’ve seen it once. in a decade.

      source

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The only time you should be doing head calcs as an engineer is to double check that you have a reasonable answer with the actual calcs on your actual calculator.

        source
• GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Second lesson: Pi is around 3.

  source