If you can put the diagonal squares from the 17 solution in a 2-3-2 configuration, I can almost see a pattern. I wonder what other configurations between 17 and 132 have a similar solution?
Comment on Cursed
a_party_german@hexbear.net 3 days ago
https://kingbird.myphotos.cc/packing/squares_in_squares.html
Mathematics has played us for absolute fools
avattar@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Why can’t it be stacked up normally? I don’t understand.
bilb@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
You could arrange them that way, but the goal is to find the way to pack the small squares in a way that results in the smallest possible outer square. If you pack them normally, the outer square will be bigger.