Comment

KoboldCoterie@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

It’s like saying you couldn’t have committed a crime because your TV was on at the time; it seems too flimsy to even be usable if you didn’t have some other form of evidence supporting that it was actually you using it to go along with it. I’m not a lawyer, so it’s possible I’m totally wrong, but surely no competent lawyer would expect that to work and no judge would take that as evidence on its own merits.

source

Sort:hotnew top

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

it seems too flimsy

Okay, then the cops will have no problem proving you were elsewhere at the time, if its a lie. Until they’ve proved it and convinced a jury of that, you’re 100% innocent.

source
- KoboldCoterie@pawb.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  The question wasn’t, “Could this be used as evidence?”, it was “Would this exonerate you?”
  
  Maybe we’re answering two different questions, but I don’t see this being enough to exonerate anyone without some supporting evidence to go with it.
  
  source