Comment on Roman numerals, man... so close!

eager_eagle@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• phoneymouse@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  69

  source
• HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The thing is, if they did have a funny sex number, it probably would’ve been 19

  source

  • jungle@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “XIX”… I’m not seeing it.

    source

    • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s their first multi-digit number that’s the same either way up

      source

      • lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Except II

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • jungle@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Still not seeing it, lol. I guess you mean it would be their 69, except that you need one to be the upside down version of the other…? I don’t know. Someone should write a research paper on this. :D

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• hansl@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  • That’s not “IV”, Obelix, that’s four.

  i.redd.it/tqfgutoy4ds31.jpg

  source
• ElJefe@lemm.ee ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  LXXXLXXXV

  source

  • eager_eagle@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I think you mean L̅X̅X̅X̅LXXXV

    source