Comment on Hertz, showing the difference between science and engineering

• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  ooh i always guessed the word “Funk” comes from function, i.e. the radio is a useful tool that has a function to whoever is using it.

  source

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It really is from “Funkentechnik”: “Spark technology”. I wonder how many people appreciate the post for the cute etymology and how many because it sounds funny.

    Good information for ham radio people, too. Hobby sounds too geeky? Just say you’re into Über-Funk-Parties.

    source

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Appreciate for both of course!

      source
    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      ok but now, where does the word “Funke” (spark) come from?

      source

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        mittelhochdeutsch (mitteldeutsch) vunke, althochdeutsch funcho, entstanden aus den mit -n- gebildeten Formen des Feuer zugrunde liegenden Substantivs

        www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Funke#Bedeutung-1

        ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Pretty much the first type of commercially viable radio transmitter was the spark-gap transmitter (“Knallfunkensender” in German). It worked by charging up some capacitors to up to 100kV and then letting them spark. This spark sent a massive banging noise on the whole radio spectrum, which could then be turned into an audible noise using a very simple receiver. That was then used to send morse codes (or similar encodings).

    They went into service around 1900, and by 1920 it was illegal to use these because they would disrupt any and all other radio transmissions in the area with a massive loud bang.

    source

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      “Knallfunkensender”

      Literally “Bang-Sparks-Sender”.

      Are you sure it’s because of the radio spectrum bang? I always thought it was because of the audible bang.

      If someone operated such a thing today, any guesses what the death zone for electronic devices would be?

      source

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        It’s a broadband bang that can be heard across the whole spectrum. It becomes audible when listening to radio broadcasts.

        Regular radio transmissions are comparatively narrow band, allowing lots of simultaneous transmissions in the same airspace, each on its own frequency. The spark gap transistor is very wide band, so it basically sounds as if you are sending a bang sound across all radio frequencies at the same time.

        It wouldn’t destroy radio equipment, but the radio transmissions. It’s basically as if you’d use a radio jammer as a morse code transmitter.

        source