Comment on Strawberries are nuts š
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world āØ21ā© āØhoursā© agoIm not being anti intellectual. I simply have no patience for frauds masquerading their metaphysics as philosophy.
In the end you canāt argue the point on its merits and are just engaging in sophistry. So weāll come back to the first: you donāt actually know what the periodic table of the elements is. You should stop pretending you have a point if you canāt make make it.
If you donāt understand the difference between metaphysics and philosophy, its probably best you did neither.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ20ā© āØhoursā© ago
Aw, donāt be a sore loser.
I canāt engage with your point on its merits because itās not relevant to the argument that Iām makingāitās a complete non-sequitur.
You want me to prove that the periodic table doesnāt predict undiscovered elements? What does that have to do with where people direct their effort and attention?
This is why the tomato fruit/vegetable example is so useful: itās about what facts are useful to whom. It actually has nothing to do with the periodic table at all, that just happens to be a particularly prickly thorn for stem majors.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world āØ20ā© āØhoursā© ago
You are delusional if you think you āwonā anything.
The only thing you did was demonstrate that you are a vapid waste of time.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone āØ20ā© āØhoursā© ago
Christ, my man, do you need a time out? Are you late for a nap or something?
I promise you thereās nothing at stake here; Iām not ādismantlingā chemistry. I agree itās useful, itās good stuff. Mendeleev did a good job.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world āØ19ā© āØhoursā© ago
you havent ādoneā anything here other than jerk yourself off.