What makes you think that?
Comment on Sony will be releasing "MONTY PYTHON AND THE HOLY GRAIL" on 4K Ultra HD on August 26.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
So they just AI upscaled it or what?
Link@rentadrunk.org 3 weeks ago
Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Iirc they were broke. So probably not using great cameras that produce great results in 4k
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
Because i doubt you can extract 4K image data from the physical film strips from 1975 without heavy post processing.
ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
You can, its been done before. 35mm film with a sufficiently small grain size can reach resolutions over 5k, close to 6k.
A few years ago there was the 4k77 project which took probably cinematic reels of A New Hope and scanned them in at 4k. At that resolution, film grain was beginning to become visible, but given the high degradation of those specific film reels it isn’t surprising there were artifacts after the scans. With properly preserved film negatives you could do significantly better.
Link@rentadrunk.org 3 weeks ago
Wasn’t it filmed in 35mm?
BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
This release is “Native 4K.” As far as I understand it, Native 4K means it was produced from scans of the film negatives, not upscaled. These releases are usually the best possible quality with the crispest and most natural image. They might have needed to do some physical cleaning of the film, and they might have done some touch up’s here and there in post, but Native 4K is ideal, and what you want in a release like this.
From blu-ray.com:
Image
ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Hopefully this will turn out better than 4K77. Not that 4k77 was bad, its just pretty clear that the film they had access to was pretty heavily degraded when they did their scans
gwheel@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
4K77 is based on a theatrical print, official releases are almost always based on the actual camera negative. Theatrical prints are generally a few copies removed from the negative, and were optimized for making lots of copies quickly rather than maximum quality or long-term preservation. The negative would have more detail and color than even a pristine print, and will better maintain it if taken care of.
BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
For sure. I’ve gotta assume they used the master film for scanning Monty Python, and if it was stored properly they probably wouldn’t have to do a ton of restoration and cleaning, but I don’t know the specifics. 4K77’s work is amazing and admirable, but not really watchable to me for exactly the reason you mentioned. I don’t think any amount of cleanup would fix that kind of degradation, though it’s still an incredible representation and artifact of the film’s history. It’s a shame that project was only necessary because of the Lucas’ stubbornness.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
Nice :)