I see this sentiment a lot. Why do you think he didnt? Why wouldnt he do both?
Comment on a tale as old as time
kadu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
[deleted]
YoFrodo@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Trekman10@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Unless she trespassed there’s nothing illegal. I don’t think she shared a specific address. It IS (was?) against the YT TOS but they only care about what makes returns for Google’s shareholders.
LukeMedia@lemmy.world 8 months ago
His point was that YouTube should not provide her a platform, whether he pursues legal action or not is separate from YouTube giving her a platform. I imagine that if he is planning to pursue legal action, he won’t be publicly talking about that for some time.
kadu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Gabu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
She’s a known content thief and generally shit person.
kadu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
JayObey711@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Why is that? If she has proven to act irresponsibly on the internet and is empowered by her cloud than all platforms should take a stance. Especially YouTube because that’s her main site. It’s not like her being a dick only happens or will only happen on Instagram.