Comment on [deleted]
Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 weeks agoYup those are all European or European-colonial nations.
You don’t see countries such as Saudi Arabia, Morocco or Cambodia on that list do you?
Comment on [deleted]
Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 weeks agoYup those are all European or European-colonial nations.
You don’t see countries such as Saudi Arabia, Morocco or Cambodia on that list do you?
BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 5 weeks ago
So, what’s you point?
I have given you a list of poor democracies that are ‘republics’ and a list of strong democracies that many/most of which are a constitutional monarchy of some flavour or another.
Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 weeks ago
I have given you a list of poor democracies that are ‘constitutional monarchies’ of some flavour or another.
My point is that you’re using correlation to prove causation.
Merva@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
You are arguing from ignorance. The terms republic and democracy and so on have rather solid definitions in political science. Republic is not a very informative descriptor of the poltical system of a country, it just means that the role of head of state in’t heritable, ie. that it isn’t a monarchy. The actual political system of a republic can be basically anything except a monarchy.
BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 5 weeks ago
no, no I’m not. I’m just pointing out correlations