Which search llm is filtering out any of the content farm and seo stuff?
Comment on Yes, AI will eventually replace some workers. But that day is still a long way off
jarfil@beehaw.org 2 days agoWhose LLMs?
Content farms and SEO experts have been polluting search results for decades. Search LLMs have leveled the playing field: any trash a content farm LLM can spit out, a search LLM can filter out.
Basically, this:
apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 day ago
jarfil@beehaw.org 1 day ago
All of them. The moment they summarize results, it automatically filters out all the chaff. Doesn’t mean what’s left is necessarily true, just like publishing a paper doesn’t mean it wasn’t p-hacked, but all the boilerplate used for generating content and SEO, is gone.
Starting with Google’s AI Overview, all the way to chatbots in “research” mode, or AI agents, they return the original “bulletpoint” that stuff was generated from.
VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
This is not accurate. You shouldn’t spread corpo propaganda.
jarfil@beehaw.org 2 days ago
Can you elaborate? It does match my personal experience, and I’ve been on both ends of the trash flinging.
msage@programming.dev 1 day ago
What is accurate then?
VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
The premise that AI enhances search is false. The stated barriers to “AI” adoption for small businesses are dated and false. The statement that LLMs and associated technology will become more accurate and reliable is false.
The accurate statement in the article, that AI has no impact on earnings or hours, is from an outside source.
So you see there is nothing of value provided by the article itself, because the article is propaganda designed to convince you that LLMs have a productive future and are presently useful for applications such as search. These are both lies. The article is lying.
msage@programming.dev 1 day ago
Yeah, but the image seems pretty spot on, and that’s what you replied to.