Comment on this post is just 42kib
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 day agoWhat do you mean “at the time”?
What time are you talking about?
Comment on this post is just 42kib
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 day agoWhat do you mean “at the time”?
What time are you talking about?
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
At the time when dithering was commonly used to achieve the illusion of more available colors, i.e. the 80s and the first half of the 90s.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I’m not really convinced that file compression was “mature” at the time. Text compression was reasonable progressed but image compression was created for a reason besides just a requirement for fixed compression ratio.
But I do agree that it was limited in it’s usefulness.
tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
I’m thinking of file compressoin formats like Zip, LHA and ARJ, which would work particularly well if the image was not dithered and used run-length encoding (e.g. the PIC format of the Atari ST). The PNG format still uses the deflate algorithm which is essentially identical to the compression used by PKZip in 1991.