Comment on Palworld confirms ‘disappointing’ game changes forced by Pokémon lawsuit
pivot_root@lemmy.world 9 hours agoBuddy, quit while you’re ahead not too far behind. You’re just proving what @Tattorack@lemmy.world said: you don’t understand the difference between patents, copyright, and trademarks.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 9 hours ago
I never claimed to be an expert, and mistakes happen. Good thing the difference between the three doesn’t matter when Palworld blatantly plagiarized the Pokemon games, and I have yet to hear an actual argument how it didn’t rip off another game.
But I get it. Pokemon can pew pew now and ignoramus’ eat up gun play.
Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
You really are that stupid, huh?
OK, let’s do a little exercise; how many of their creature designs have been changed since launch?
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 9 hours ago
Watch your mouth before someone closes it for you. Just some friendly advice.
Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Now look who’s sounding tough from behind a screen. :)
Anyway, no. No I won’t.