Comment on Discussion Thread đ Wednesday 7 May 2025
RustyRaven@aussie.zone â¨6⊠â¨days⊠agoHow could it be anything but circumstantial? Itâs rare in any murder trial to have direct evidence, and poisoning is inherently a hidden and secretive crime. Unless she actually videoed herself picking poisonous mushrooms, putting them the meal, and saying she knowâs theyâre poisonous I canât see any way you could have direct evidence.
Circumstantial evidence is not bad evidence. Once you have a reasonable amount of different bits of evidence all pointing in the same direction it becomes very solid evidence.
tone212_@aussie.zone â¨6⊠â¨days⊠ago
I agree. But circumstantial evidence is only good when it leads to no other reasonable explanation besides intent to kill. I havenât heard of any evidence (so far at least) that goes beyond the accused acting suss. Thereâs weeks of this trial to go, Iâm only referring to whatâs come out so far.