Comment on Apple's USB-C transition is a confusing mess (and that might be on purpose)
Ulrich@feddit.org 13 hours agoApple wasn’t ever interested in supporting that niche at budget prices because there’s little money to be made there.
Not true. Difference in cost between USB 2&3 is negligible. They’ve just done this to create artificial value for the “Pro” models. Same way they create artificial value with ram and storage.
misk@sopuli.xyz 11 hours ago
Correct. They found out professionals have money to afford premium hardware and software so you can charge them that. Perfectly reasonable way to make money.
Ulrich@feddit.org 11 hours ago
You may have glossed over the part where I said this is not premium hardware. Even bargain basement Android phones come with USB3. They’ve gone out of their way to ensure their less expensive (but still very expensive) devices have bad hardware.
misk@sopuli.xyz 8 hours ago
Going by number of features isn’t really a way to tell what’s premium. For me the bar is set really low which is not having ads, which most budget Android phones fail at.
Ulrich@feddit.org 8 hours ago
We are not going by “number of features”, we’re “going by” one specific feature.