Comment on 4 fundamental forces

• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That, and have you seen the amount of propellant required to overcome gravity? Compare that to the amount of fissile material you need to make a viable nuclear device. It’s peanuts.

  You inadvertently argued against your point. It takes only a tiny amount of fissile material to generate the energy needed to escape the gravitation of an entire planet.

  But not really because you only compared chemical energy to fission.

  source

  • archonet@lemy.lol ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yeah, but we have no useful way to channel the energy from nuclear fission into propulsion, so that’s a moot point if we’re talking in practical terms. At least, we don’t without irradiating everything.

    source

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You can do nuclear without irradiating everything just like a nuclear plant doesn’t irradiate everything. The only reason it isn’t done is safety. Rockets fail too often.

      The argument that gravity is in anyway a more powerful force than weak force (fission) or strong force (fusion) is wrong. The only thing gravity has is distance. The strong force is 100 trillion trillion trillion times stronger than gravity.

      source
• will_a113@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I was more just speaking to how it’s many orders of magnitude weaker than the other 3 forces. Though it does work on an infinite scale, so maybe it ought to be a tiny bit unbelievably long vaguely dragon-shaped worm thing.

  source
• TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Upvoted for Mass Effect, my beloved.

  source