So then should be easy to make up for the lack of taxpayer funding then, right? If it costs so little, the people who care about it should be happy to pay for it. :)
I’m not gonna engage with bad faith bait. That’s idiotic and we both know it.
They could have avoided this if they would have stayed neutral in their reporting and staffing.
Well I guess they could have given up reporting on reality like most corporate media, but that was one of the primary advantages of not being a corporate owned propaganda machine.
Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com 2 days ago
NPR should not be funded by the tax payers. That said, very little of their funding comes from the government. This is mostly symbolic.
DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Which should be easy to make up for. Because if people like them so much, then donations would be easy to make up for it.
Liberals seem to want a lot of stuff that they aren’t willing to pay for lately.
Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com 2 days ago
Liberals are not charitable. Conservatives are by nature. So even small cut will impact them heavily because it’s not like liberals will donate.
DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today 2 days ago
good point