Comment on If you're still on Lemmy...
HereIAm@lemmy.world 14 hours agoThe protocol itself could surely start its journey if enshittification? In which case different, possibly incompatible, branches would spawn fragmenting the Lemmy space. Still miles better than the whole thing burning to the ground. But with no shareholders looming around (yet) we can hope it won’t come to that.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 14 hours ago
I don’t see how, it’s covered by a good license, and if it did it’d be forked in an instant. Can you give a historical example?
HereIAm@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
I guess the closest I know of is Maps.me and Organic Maps? Maps.me was open source, but got purchased and enshittified, so Organic Maps was forked from it. And now there is some drama with the Organic Maps shareholders/co-founders, so unless that is (or has it already been?) sorted out we’re likely to see another fork of it.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t the main dev(s) members of lemmy.ml? So I can certainly see how differing political views could skew the development of the main branch of Lemmy.
farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
The organic maps founders seem to have convinced the volunteers that a private company would be best to manage an open source project. The community got duped hard.
HereIAm@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
I agree. And luckily for Lemmy and all other FOSS projects the worst that can happen is a fork of the project is created with a potentially fractured community.
communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 12 hours ago
That’s a bad example because it got forked and it wasn’t an actual problem?
People say this all the time but never can give even one example of a potential problem. Forking sounds insane to me.
HereIAm@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
But that’s exactly what I said in the beginning. The worst that can happen is the original creators take the project in an undesired direction so a fork is created.