Yet if you’re not part of the conflict there’s no reason to support one side over the other.
Comment on [deleted]
CrypticFawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months agoPeace can only be achieved once one side has been destroyed, for the simple fact that neither can tolerate the others existence.
I wish peace was a viable option, but it just isn’t.
bouh@lemmy.world 8 months ago
spiderplant@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Yeah there is. If you’re antifascist and anti-imperialist you should support the oppressed people.
If you don’t side explicitly against fascist states and American imperialism then you support it.
bouh@lemmy.world 8 months ago
And support terrorism? Tell me how will these large scale attack make life better for Palestinians?
spiderplant@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Terrorism or liberation?
How will the opposite help?
Injustice can happen under peace, so peace is not the answer. Peace is the language of the oppressor, liberation and justice is the language of the oppressed.
Also if America backs someone and calls their opponents terrorists even through they funded them, does that mean the opponents are actually terrorists?
nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I think that’s good advice for social situations, but if you truly believe there is genocide occurring, or exploration, then there is nothing wrong with supporting one side over the other.
Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It is. If Israel moves.