Comment on [deleted]
ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 1 month agoYou said “he was under a deportation order”. He was not. That was your only actual argument, so did you have any others?
Comment on [deleted]
ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 1 month agoYou said “he was under a deportation order”. He was not. That was your only actual argument, so did you have any others?
Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com 1 month ago
He was. Go read the court order.
ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 1 month ago
He wasn’t. Hard to prove a negative, so why don’t you link the court order that you baselessly claim exists?
Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com 1 month ago
This has always been asked and answered. It’s in the scotus ruling and confirmed by the United States government. The only issue is they deported him to El Salvador. The Secretary of State can overrule the withholding order but has not done so at this time.
ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 1 month ago
So “go read the court order” seems like a super easy way to win this argument. You could just say which one! I won’t even say you have to give me a link, because I can “do my own research” or whatever.
You said “because of court order”. I said, “which one”. You have no answer so far, but keep trying!