I’m not sure AGI would. Maybe ASI. But in the end it’s still humans that would likely have to enact whatever proposals it came up with.
Comment on Why the climate promises of AI sound a lot like carbon offsets
Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 week ago
Well AGI would solve climate change in a hearbeat but nobody knows wether it’ll take 5 or 500 years to get there or what other consequences comes with it. Personally I tend to think that we don’t solve it by cutting emissions but rather with technology wether that be carbon capture or not. This is something AI at least has the potential to help us with.
realitista@lemm.ee 1 week ago
FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
Its solution is nuclear winter.
realitista@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Well, you can’t argue that it wouldn’t work ;-)
The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org 6 days ago
It’s nice to imagine we can keep living exactly as we are and not have to pay up for any of the consequences of our actions. Maybe there will be a tech miracle to save us and the non-consenting species we are taking with us, but that hope, belief, and gamble is not a solution to the problem we have.
We have the solution, we know what it is, and we know how to execute it, we just lack the will. Until that miracle appears we should try to actually fix the problem.
Waiting for a tech solution to appear is like standing on the beach after an earthquake as the tide goes out praying that it won’t come back in.