Comment on logs are for quitters

• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Using the rule of thumb, anything heavier than iron requires energy input to fuse. So you lose energy fusing uranium.

  source
• davidgro@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Serious answer: A huge negative amount. Anything above iron requires energy to fuse (which is why it produces energy from fission.) and I’m pretty sure nothing with 184 protons could be stable enough to count as being produced - the nuclei be more smashed apart than merging at that point.

  source
• PunnyName@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Ask Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

  In alphabetical order.

  source

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Those are fission. Fusion bombs don’t fuse uranium. They use a fission bomb to fuse Lithium.

    source

    • anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      [deleted]

      source

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Look at all these nuclear scientists on Lemmy.

        source
      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Sorry I meant Lithium Deuteride.

        6Li2H

        en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      For that matter, even the Nagasaki bomb (“Fat Man”) didn’t use Uranium at all - its fuel was Plutonium.

      source
    • frezik@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Oh, they do, but not as the primary or secondary. You can wrap depleated uranium around the core to capture fast neutrons that are leftover from the rest of the process. Changing the number of layers is how you can dial in a desired yield.

      source
    • PunnyName@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Damnit, you’re right and I’m wrong!

      source
  • davidgro@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s fissed, not fused.

    source

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I stand corrected, because I done forgetted.

      source