Maybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”.
Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
Comment on At least Quark had some integrity.
WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoThere are obviously still contacts where the distinction is important.
Maybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”.
Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
Immediate scenario that came to mind here is
The client demanded any other public defender, as long as they weren’t black or female.
lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Such as discussing discrimination, statistics, etc