Comment

You’re correct on your judgment but your opinion stems from a different social stance on the underlying issue.

(that sounded really pedantic and it was not my intention)

Morality is a human creation. By default, nothing is wrong or right, until a human mind, be it an individual or colective one, analyse it and evaluate it.

This does not mean you can not view something as being immoral while others do or understand it as not a moral concern. This difference of understandingb is what moves any subject into the moral/immoral spectrum.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Im not sure about that. Many animals show a sense of morality. The difficulty, i think, comes from the need to ascribe morals to everything we do and to find nuance that confuses the fundamental tenants of morality. At a basic level there are some things that many animals other than humans inherently know are good or bad.

source
- qyron@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Like what?
  
  The capability, in other animals, to determine something as positive, negative or neutral only serves to demonstrate that we, humans, are only another organism built with previously tried and proved strategies, with a few added innovative add-ons.
  
  Morality is a human creation and concern, built upon biological strategies implemented in many life forms.
  
  source
  - Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6404642/#:~:….
    
    There’s a good amount of information on this article. Near the top, they list and cite instances where moral behaviour had been observed in animals. Where no apparent gain or loss occurs for the one behaving morally.
    
    I understand your point of view, but you present as fact something that is currently highly debated theory. I try to posit only my views and opinions and try to avoid conflating them with facts.
    
    I guess it’s better to attempt to philosophise when dealing with our views on morality.
    
    source
    qyron@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    “moral” and “morality” in that article is clearly a human construction, into which ties the notion of ethics, which is again a human construct
    
    What is clearly pointed are several instances where selfless behavior was observed in diferent life forms, from birds to mammals, including primates.
    
    source