About 30 seconds after I made it, correct that’s how long it took to find. It’s a lesson for you if nothing else.
It quite literally does so stop crying.
Comment on Cathy, do the math.
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 weeks agoYou edited your comment to add demographic information of any kind for the first time, however, that document does not break down union membership demographics by college education, so it is completely irrelevant to the point being discussed.
Moreover, even if the majority of member in a union, or even in unions in general, are not college educated, that’s still not the claim being discussed. The question is whether college educated people are more likely to belong to a union than non-college educated people are. Since there are more people without college educations, most unions are probably primarily people without college educations, despite people with college educations being overrepresented relative to their size in the general population.
Madison420@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
You’re lying (as always), and also haven’t read it yourself. I know, because I did read it, and it doesn’t contain the information you claim it does.
You could prove that I’m wrong/lying (for the first time this conversation, compared to the many times I’ve proved the same of you) by simply linking the part where it says it.
Smart of you to find something with more text than last time so I can’t demonstrate that you’re lying with screenshots, you’re getting so much better at bad faith trolling and gish galloping.
Madison420@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I provided literarily everything you could need, you’re simply too lazy to utilize the resources before you.
Madison420@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It does break it down by student but sure, try that plus math instead. I know you won’t but at least you have less to cry about.
bls.gov/…/union2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjd7PT3hZeMAxW97sk…
That’s exactly the claim you made or is basic understanding of the English language the hangup here.
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Dead link.
Image
Madison420@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yes it does, inference and correlation you’ll note I provided three of the largest labor statistics in the USA. Do some math and leg work on your own, I’m not your goddamn professor and if I were I still wouldn’t and you’d be failing.
That’s a picture and you already said it isn’t dead you’re just lazy or uninventive.
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
No, it doesn’t. I can’t invent numbers out of thin air like you do.
I was able to access it further down the thread, yes.
You are no doubt making this comment in hopes of getting me to make a bunch of comments about the PDF, so that your lie about me having made “like 7 comments” about the link, when I had made two (one saying I couldn’t access it, and one addressing the contents once I was able to) would appear to be true to anyone not following the timestamps.
You really are quite shameless.
Madison420@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
You have to put it in Google because it’s a direct link to a pdf and the labor website doesn’t like to redirect those. Last to use the Internet and cry less.
Objection@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Yes, I’m sure everyone understood that when you posted the link, it needed to be copy-pasted into google, since that’s what everyone does with links. You know you can just say things without hurling random insults, right?
The pdf breaks it down by race, age, gender, full-time vs part-time, and by state - but notably, not by education level. Which you would know if you actually read it before posting.