Comment on Dunning-Kruger

• Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  And yet, when someone explained to you what the PhD said and meant, your response was:

  So not what the phd claims

  And just now you were still comparing them to anti-vaxx doctors “if they meant that”, when they clearly didn’t mean that, and you were already told what they meant. You’re still pretending that maybe they said something wrong. They didn’t.

  source

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    they clearly didn’t mean that, and you were already told what they meant.

    Which one is it? Is it they clearly didn’t mean what that person said or is it they meant what that person said

    source

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Or the thought the phd must have meant something else

      But sure the phd is wrong if he meant that; just like those anti-vax doctors and anti-abortion doctors

      The PhD is not wrong. The PhD meant what they said, but it is not what you think they meant or said. The mistake is yours, and you still insist that maybe it’s the PhD who’s wrong and meant something else they didn’t say - even after somebody else correctly explained what the PhD said and meant, to which you wrongly responded “that’s not what the PhD claims.”

      source

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        So you’re saying the person’s explanation was correct so it is crazy conservative theories

        source

        • -> View More Comments