Comment on Dunning-Kruger

• IZZI@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  So we agree that there are

  XX - woman XY - man

  And some genetic mutationa in between XXY - Klinfelter syndrome XXXY - no idea how this is called X -Turner syndrome XX intersex XY intersex And true gonadal intersex

  And still these are medical conditions, a man on drugs wearing a wig is still a man, and a woman on drugs to grow facial hair is still a woman.

  It’s a he and a she regardless

  source

  • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Honey, nobody claims that trans women are biologically identical to cis women or the other way around. Sex is not gender.

    And chromosomal deviations is exactly what the PhD in the OP is talking about. You can call them medical conditions if you like, but that doesn’t change the fact that there are XY women and XX cis men.

    source

    • IZZI@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Ok here I can see my lack in logic. I understood that the PhD was saying that XX can change into XY during the life of the person, not that they are born XY and naturally develop female traits.

      My only pet peeve with all this is “misgendering” which I honestly despise. If one is a grown up 180cm male I’m never gonna call him a “her” just because of a wig and makeup.

      But if someone was raised as a woman because that’s how her body developed even if she has XY chromosomes I won’t call her “he”.

      source

      • pack_of_racoons@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        just because of a wig and makeup

        Why do bigots always assume trans women can’t grow their own hair?

        Is the assumption seriously that your average trans woman looks like a burly bearded man with a receding hairline?

        source
      • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        My only pet peeve with all this is “misgendering” which I honestly despise. If one is a grown up 180cm male I’m never gonna call him a “her” just because of a wig and makeup.

        Interesting.

        What if they were 165cm, had the face and body and voice of a woman and you had no idea they were trans? Would you them He if you found out?

        Would you call a big burly bearded guy She after you found out they are a trans man?

        If yes, why so? If no, why so?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • iltg@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    so we agree that

    1: one 2: two

    and then there are just some numbers in between, 0.1, 0.2…

    this is just a fact, you coming in these comments wielding words you don’t understand and concepts you barely grasps doesn’t make you smart or correct

    you’re just a bigot regardless

    source

    • IZZI@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Numbers that can be proven mathematically. The gender idiology is nothing more than:

      “Today I feel…”

      source

      • iltg@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        gender is nothing more than “today i feel”

        congrats on your strawman, you’re really driving your point home

        numbers can be proven mathematically

        congrats on proving math with math

        there is scientific proof that gender ideology is not “today i feel”, that sex and gender are distinct. you brought up multiple chromosomal conditions which are part of the scientific proof of such claim, but are too sold on high school biology to entertain complex concepts

        if you want to bring “science” in this discussion, maybe read it first? it’s ok to be uninformed, you can be wrong on the internet

        source