Comment on Celebrating my 1000th comment. Here is a shitpost.

• Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It is not a serious opinion, but if I’m going to defend it the first thing I’ll say is that it’s meant to be the inverse of physiognomy.

  source

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Physiognomy does not discriminate between cause and effect, it refers only to moral judgements based on physical characteristics. Even the “positive” option embraces the thought.

    source

    • Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I will say once more in clearer terms, I do not sincerely believe in this idea - in any form. You seem to want there to be a serious discussion here but this is a shitposting community and after this clarification I will resume acting accordingly.

      source

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        So you don’t believe in the idea in this non-serious sub, but also won’t admit you were wrong about the basic definition?

        Btw, the reason Dahl believed in physiognomy:

        www.cnn.com/travel/article/…/index.html

        source

        • -> View More Comments