Comment on nets
x00z@lemmy.world 2 days agoCommon misconception. It’s simple supply and demand. Do you think people would be destroying the seas if nobody would pay them for it?
Comment on nets
x00z@lemmy.world 2 days agoCommon misconception. It’s simple supply and demand. Do you think people would be destroying the seas if nobody would pay them for it?
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has no bearing on this discussion.
Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
If no one ate fish anymore, would it still be profitable to fish in an industrial style?
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
I don’t think that’s likely to happen. do you have another method that might be effective?
x00z@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You’re claiming my choice has no impact, but it does because of supply and demand. It’s very small, but it’s still there.
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
this is just handwaiving. supply and demand isn’t a magic phrase that makes your actions have the desired effect.
x00z@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s why I’m sharing the solution:
Don’t contribute to the problem.
If we don’t eat fish there would be close to no nets in the oceans.