Comment on I hate this image because idiots will see it, not understand what its showing, and make up some crazy shit based on it.

aeronmelon@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  “the exact center of the Big Bang” is not a phrase that makes sense.

  source
• gazter@aussie.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I’m not sure if this answers the question, but it might help.

  Everything in space is moving, but it’s not expanding outward from a central point, like an explosion. Instead, the space between the things is getting bigger.

  The balloon analogy gets thrown around a lot, but I find it misleading- It’s not about the balloon getting bigger, expanding outward from the center of the sphere. It’s more about the surface of that balloon stretching.

  The rubber sheet analogy helps. Scatter a bunch of things on a infinite rubber sheet. Now stretch that in all directions - the things get further apart, but are not moving away from a central point.

  source

  • Lysergid@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Does it mean space being created out of nothing between things? I’m not good at it but wouldn’t that violate conservation of energy?

    source

    • gazter@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I believe that’s what dark energy is- the shortfall from not violating conservation of energy, given what we know about physics vs what we observe in the universe.

      source
    • NotLemming@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      How? There’s nothing between the things so I’m guessing there’s no energy?

      source

      • Lysergid@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        My understanding Quantum field theory says virtual particles can be created out of vacuum fluctuations, which makes me think there will be more energy after expansion. Again, I might be getting it wrong.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I think that’s the point of the webb

  source