Comment on Chad rule

• Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Your assumptions for my reasons for responding is based on your personal biases. It indicates a lack of curiosity as to who I am as in individual.

  source

  • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    The only part of you is know as an individual is that you defend people making fun of other people appearances. No part of me wants to continue finding out who you are.

    Go make fun of someone’s political or envirmental beliefs and I may support you more. But to defend someone after they go after the way someone else wants thier own body to look? Nah, I’m good

    source

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Cool. And yet you keep responding and so what does that say about you? What compels you to continue this demonstration? Do you feel your superior virtue has not be made clear?

      It feels like you need to silence me and your method involves intimidating me. What is your justification for this.

      Why do draw the line at beliefs? This is all endless curious to me.

      I am most curious why your curiosity has this hardline and what makes you feel so extremely justified, so certain. All this allowing you to draw a hard line here of all places.

      I expect you won’t elaborate but I suspect it is all based on emotion and not logic.

      I’m not sure if it was your another that indicated I should fear being body shamed myself and so how much of all this is based on your fear of being body shamed.

      I know mine is partly based on not giving a shit if someone wants to make fun of me because I would never give another person that power over me.

      source

      • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        It’s very simple:

        If you are being a jerk or defending someone being a jerk, I will not be, nor do I have to be, nice to you

        Good day

        source

        • -> View More Comments