Comment on At this rate, why not.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month agoWhy is the second guaranteed to be smaller?
We know how nuclear bombs work. The majority of the energy comes from nuclear fission, a highly exothermic process, that can (in the foreseeable future) only be used in bombs.
If we don’t need to drop the bomb, but rather assemble it in place, it can just use deuterium as a fusion fuel. Deuterium can be distilled from normal water for much less energy that it generates in fusion.
marcos@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes, from an extremely inefficient fission reaction that can be improved by an order of magnitude by doing it slowly in a reactor.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Mixed up fission and fusion there, they sound so similar in English.
The comment talks about fusion.
marcos@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Most of the energy does not come from fusion.
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
It does in modern designs, the first time it happened was in 1952.
To quote Wikipedia:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion