Comment on Anon finds a hidden message in Shrek
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 weeks agoI would consider all of these events individually implausible, just for starters.
If they were plausible, then there wouldn’t be a religion surrounding the guy.
Comment on Anon finds a hidden message in Shrek
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 weeks agoI would consider all of these events individually implausible, just for starters.
If they were plausible, then there wouldn’t be a religion surrounding the guy.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Religious figures can, and do, exist without the need for “miracles”. Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha), Confucius, and Socrates are all venerated for their philosophy rather than any particular supernatural aspects of their existence. Even in Christianity, the back half of The Gospels are just letters distributed among the apostles focused on building up the Catholic Church as an institution. The miraculous Jesus was something religious scholars had to lobby as canonical for centuries before it was officially recognized. And the Gnostic movement - the really whoo-whoo side of Christianity that hinged on some even more esoteric beliefs - never maintained the kind of following that the more secularized “Jesus is a philosopher king we should emulate” attitude of subsequent Christian groups.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
This is just flat out false. The gospels were still written within the first century and even then, the oldest letter - The epistle to the Galatians - still testifies that Jesus rose from the dead.
(1 Thessalonians is a contestant for the oldest, but still)
1 Thessalonians 1:10 ESV
The letters carry a miraculous nature
1 Corinthians 15:3-8 ESV
If you got rid of the Gospels and revelation in the New Testament, the Faith remains mainly the same.