firstly, i find it funny how u insist this isnt a morality debate. but what is most interesting to me is how u say:
You should be free to eat how you feel you need to in order to satisfy your needs, as well as your moral code- provided it remains within the limits of the law.
so ur ok with the state and its police coming in and telling u what not to eat or to give birth, but when anyone else does it, thats no longer okay?
seems like kind of an arbitrary position. like, what is ur actual stance on the issue? or does it always flex around whatever the law of the place ur in says?
oh and as others have already said, if ur diet infringes on other beings right to live, u forfeit ur right to not be criticized for what u eat. imo
tomi000@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I dont understand your point. Everyone DOES have the freedom you are talking about and noone is debating that. Why are you pretending like thats not the case?
In some areas men are allowed to best their wives. Youre still allowed to critisize them for it, and you should be allowed to.
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yet another false equivalency. You can’t stop, can you?
tomi000@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Explain please how it is not exactly the same.
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No.