Comment on If AI spits out stuff it's been trained on

• Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  CSAM = Child sexual abuse material
  Even virtual material is still legally considered CSAM in most places. Although no children were hurt, it’s a depiction of it. And that’s enough.

  source

  • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Being legally considered CSAM and actually being CSAM are two different things. I stand behind what I said which wasn’t legal advise. By definition it’s not abuse material because nobody has been abused.

    source

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      There’s a reason it’s legally considered CSAM. as I explained it is material that depicts it.
      You can’t make up your own definitions.

      source

      • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        I already told you that I’m not speaking from legal point of view. CSAM means a specific thing and AI generated content doesn’t fit under this definition. The only way to generate CSAM is by abusing children and taking pictures/videis of it. AI content doesn’t count any more than stick figure drawings do. The justice system may not differentiate the two but that is not what I’m talking about.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Which law are you speaking about?

        source