Comment

Comment on How is the current AI bubble when compared to the .com bubble in the early 2000's?

I was alive during the dot com bubble and I don’t think normal people even noticed it. The web was a lot less centralised back in those days and stayed that way for a while. The websites that people were actually using didn’t go anywhere when the bubble burst but there was a lot more website turnover in those days anyway. People were always moving to a better newer service and there were multiple search engines that people used. Then AltaVista turned up and that was the engine to use, until Google turned up and everyone started using that. I still remember when Google was this cool new thing that most people hadn’t heard of.

source

Sort:hotnew top

adespoton@lemmy.ca ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
A lot of people didn’t notice it, but it affected a little of people. That was the time of supply-on-demand, just in time manufacturing, rapid prototyping, and a lot of other behind the scenes stuff that was caught up in the bubble. Despite the name, it wasn’t all about websites. It was about unregulated venture capitalism.

Fast forward to AI, and there’s a lot more regulation, and barriers to entry. You’re not getting money thrown at you for having an idea… with AI today; a few well financed companies are spending lots of money on AI and then selling their services to established players to include the AI tagline.

In my view, AI has closer ties to the Cloud Services bubble.

source
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

until Google turned up and everyone started using that.

My older brother, who was a graduated CS major, turned me on to it way before anyone else had heard of it. He was also the first person to introduce me to the existence of Java (not script) when he brought a book home for the holidays some years before that.

I mostly agree with the above take. Except people were talking about this stuff on the news a lot. It was one of the interesting stories of the time. As well as Y2K and the increased traffic in Silicon Valley.

The big difference (to me) is that the public is, I think, more aware in that you can see it on your daily carry devices and tell that there’s something neat there, sorta, but not enough to want it. Back then it was stuff other people were doing while only a fraction (I couldn’t tell you how many) people were already online. Not that I think most of the public is using AI, but they know it’s an option on a device (or more) that they already have as opposed to being excluded.

Both are colossal wastes of capital.

source