apolo399
@apolo399@lemmy.world
- Comment on Multiverse 3 weeks ago:
Sure, but anything that tried to explain the observations would be a dark matter theory, and if that theory involved particles, it’d be a particle theory.
Dark matter isn’t a theory, nor is it particles, it’s just a body of observations that’s poorly named. In that sense, dark matter definitely exists, we just don’t know in what shape or form.
- Comment on Multiverse 3 weeks ago:
They don’t “communicate” faster than light, the wave function itself is non-local and collapses non-locally.
- Comment on Multiverse 3 weeks ago:
Dark matter is not a thing, it’s an observation, a phenomenon that was poorly named. There’s so much evidence under the name “sark matter” that we can’t discount it as a real phenomenon. We just don’t have a strong evidence for a single dark matter theory (theory in the scientific sense of the word, not the colloquial one).
- Comment on Good to see AAFES looking out for my health 2 months ago:
Here is an excelent Kurzgesagt video.
- Comment on Checkmate 5 months ago:
I’ll add Spanish! “Alfil”, taken from arabic “(al-)fil”, taken from persian “pil”, meaning “the elephant”, since at some point in the past the piece was, evidently, an elephant.
- Comment on 1 + 1 6 months ago:
No, it’s correct. You define the operation by it’s properties. It’s not saying that “a plus 0 = a” but "the result of applying the binary operation ‘+’ to any number with 0 should give the original number."
- is just a symbol. You could instead write it as +(a,0)=a and +(a,S(b))=S(+(a,b)).
You have to have previously defined 1=S(0), 2=S(1), 3=S(2), and so on.
- Comment on Space Alert 7 months ago:
Commenting to check later.
- Comment on I just cited myself. 7 months ago:
The system works perfectly, it just looks wonky in base 10. In base 3 0.333… looks like 0.1, exactly 0.1
- Comment on I just cited myself. 7 months ago:
Do you know what an irrational number is?
- Comment on I just cited myself. 7 months ago:
Sure, let’s do it in base 3. 3 in base 3 is 10, and 3^(-1) is 10^(-1), so:
1/3 in base 10 = 1/10 in base 3 0.3… in base 10 = 0.1 in base 3
Multiply by 3 on both sides:
3 × 0.3… in base 10 = 10 × 0.1 in base 3 0.9… in base 10 = 1 in base 3.
But 1 in base 3 is also 1 in base 10, so:
0.9… in base 10 = 1 in base 10
- Comment on ochem 7 months ago:
Carbohydrates are the ones with (H_2 O)_n
- Comment on Horseshoe theory 11 months ago:
But snakes are legless lizards. Link to youtube
- Comment on They are watching 1 year ago:
Idiotic joke