ky56

@ky56@aussie.zone

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Could letting 16-year-olds vote improve youth health? These countries have tried it⁩ ⁨⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  This would be probably help fight the Under 16 Social Media Ban idiocracy, Negative Gearing and and a bunch of other massive topics. Awesome. You just know the Libs would turn the accusations of “radicalized” youth to 11. I love how being anti povo and war is considered “radicalized”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Should (and can) we ban political donations?⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Can I donate to your campaign to ban political donations?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Windows 11 is now automatically enabling OneDrive folder backup without asking permission⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Doesn’t Windows 10 already do that? I could never get the freaking thing to leave my files behind and disable itself.

  Windows 10 LTSC for the win if you have software you can’t yet abandon.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  My major issue with copyright is how published works can have major cultural significance. How it can shift ideas and shape minds. But your not allowed to have some fun with on a personal level. How can it be the norm that the most important scientific knowledge and other culturally significant material is locked behind such restrictive measures. Essentially ensuring that middle class and especially poor people are locked out.

  If you publish something, even if it’s paid, you don’t deserve such restrictive rights. You deserve to be compensated for your work but you don’t deserve to make it into a extortion racket.

  My view on your second point is if you have posted it publicly with no paywall, maybe you should still get some percentage revenue but you don’t have a say in what it can be used. To place restrictions on what it can be used for when posting it publicly is academic as it’s basically unenforceable.

  We live in a society which revolves around the discovery and sharing of ideas. We are all entitled to a certain amount of the sharing of that information. That’s the whole point. To have some business man who was in the right place at the right time create an extortion racket out of something culturally significant they almost certainly didn’t create is wrong.

  Sorry if this is all over the place. I’m writing this while tired.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  All the AI race has done is surface the long standing issue of how broken copyright is for the online internet era. Artists should be compensated but trying to do that using the traditional model which was originally designed with physical, non infinitely copyable goods in mind is just asinine.

  One such model could be to make the copyright owner automatically assigned by first upload on any platform that supports the API. An API provided and enforced by the US copyright office. A percentage of the end use case can be paid back as royalties. I haven’t really thought out this model much further than this.

  Machine learning is here to say and is a useful tool that can be used for good and evil things alike.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The activist who’s taking on artificial intelligence in the courts: ‘This is the fight of our lives’⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Dumbass. YouTube has single-handedly proven how broken the copyright system is and this dick want to make it worse. There need to be a fair-er rebalancing of how people are compensated and for how long.

  What exactly that looks like I’m not sure but I do know that upholding the current system is not the answer.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Sega of America accused of trying to axe 40 percent of unionized staff⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  They made or were involved in Alien Isolation 2013.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Exciting news! The free API you were using is no more free!⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  openAI anyone?