hanekam

@hanekam@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Never change, lemmy.ml⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  The effect of the 2 party system on how people understand politics and society is incredibly interesting

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Never change, lemmy.ml⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Maybe? We’re currently trying to implement a different economic transition, from pollution to green. I don’t think popular resistance to those changes imply that we should try for a happy medium instead. Similarly, the difficulty in achieving Socialism democratically doesn’t necessarily imply anything about how desirable the end state would be.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[META] Never change, lemmy.ml⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  The big issue with “trying” communism is that it historically has only really occurred through violent revolution. The political instability in these situations gives a perfect opportunity for the seizing of power by exactly those kinds of people.

  Gradualist Socialism was the political project for Social Democrats in post-war Europe. They had 30-odd years to achieve it in several countries. The issue becomes that once they started notching up victories, radicalism decreased, and that when they’re not starving and oppressed people categorically will not vote to let someone collectivize their farms and expropriate their homes. It seems clear to me that in real-world conditions, a Socialist state can only come about through revolution, because the path in a democracy is far too long and leaves far too many angles of attack from a liberal opposition.