kevin
@kevin@mander.xyz
- Comment on the lifestyle 5 weeks ago:
I’ll just leave this here beautiful.makie.org/dev/examples/2d/…/hist
- Comment on To deter predators... 5 weeks ago:
Species don’t evolve to solve a problem, they evolve randomly and sometimes that solves a problem for them. Eh… they mutate randomly, and then selection acts. If there is variation that solves a problem, selection will promote that variation.
Evolution is very much not random, it is a direct consequence of variation and selection. This does not mean that they evolve to solve problems, but problems often drive evolution.
- Comment on Oxygen 2 months ago:
- Comment on Nature is blunt. 3 months ago:
By this logic, you and everyone else agree to climate change. Everyone in Venezuela agrees to Maduro.
It has nothing to do with majority, it’s a collective action and balance of power.
- Comment on This hybrid baby monkey is made of cells from two embryos 1 year ago:
Your plan can only help people on the lower end of the economic distribution. What we need is technology to let rich people live longer so that they can continue to enjoy the fruits of what can only be their completely deserved and meritorious wealth.
/s
- Comment on Humanised kidneys grown inside pigs for the first time 1 year ago:
There are a lot of things that would be “pretty cool” as long as we don’t worry about the suffering they inflict. I mean, in a sense, factory farms are pretty cool in their level of technical sophistication and efficiency of converting grain and energy into meat. The accomplishments of breeding to generate chickens with breasts so large they can’t stand up or procreate without intervention, and grow so fast their skeletons can’t keep up with their weight are amazing. The density of animals we can grow while keeping loses to disease acceptably low with antibiotics is also remarkable.
And yet, all of these things that are “pretty cool” are also horrendous on a scale that is difficult to comprehend. Raising an intelligent animal like a pig just to harvest its heart for a human might be an ethical trade-off you’re comfortable with - and given our treatment of animals for food I’ve no doubt that it’s one society at large is fine with. If my own parent needed a heart transplant, I would likely have a hard time saying no if this were available. But from a Rawlsian perspective, thinking in advance, I don’t think this is something we should be doing.
You know, it would also be pretty cool to have some kind of animal that could perform human-level tasks and ideally could understand human language. Maybe we could distinguish them from people based on some superficial physical characteristic like skin color 🤔
- Comment on Humanised kidneys grown inside pigs for the first time 1 year ago:
Well that’s an excessively low bar.