rah
@rah@hilariouschaos.com
- Comment on Pride rainbows taken off police cars after court ruling 3 days ago:
British police aren’t right wing.
LOL
- Comment on Pride rainbows taken off police cars after court ruling 3 days ago:
poor, defenseless, innocent women
Not doing yourself any favours with this kind of sarcastic comment.
Anyone who advocates for the disenfranchisement of trans people
I’ve never seen anybody argue that trans people should be denied the right to vote. Including in this article.
- Comment on Pride rainbows taken off police cars after court ruling 4 days ago:
Did you read it?
Yes.
She doesn’t think Trans people, a part of the LGBT community, exist.
The article makes no mention of whether she views trans people as existing. Again, you’re jumping to conclusions. And to be frank, you’re being ridiculous.
- Comment on Pride rainbows taken off police cars after court ruling 5 days ago:
You’ll never guess what the ‘T’ in LGBT stands for…
You’ll never guess what the ‘L’ in LGBT stands for…
She is actively seeking to drive a wedge between LGBT communities and the police
I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion given the article. You seem to be jumping to conclusions.
as well as trying to divide people in regards to LGBT issues
Again, I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion about her goals. The fact that she simply has a different opinion to others doesn’t imply a goal of dividing people. Dividing people may be a conseqeunce of her actions but that doesn’t imply it’s her goal.
She will happily cut off her nose to spite her face, if it means harming trans people.
Again, this is jumping to conclusions.
And being part of a community doesn’t make you immune from being against the community. … there’s homophobic/transphobic/biphobic people in the LGBT community
True but that doesn’t mean any particular person who is critical of one section of the community is necessarily against the whole community, that doesn’t follow.
there were Jews in Germany who hated Jews and happily supported Nazis
Firstly wow that took no time at all en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Secondly, this is a false equivalence. Every example you’ve given is of a member of a community being against the whole community but in the case we’re discussing, a member of a community is critical of only part of the community, not the whole community.
- Comment on Pride rainbows taken off police cars after court ruling 5 days ago:
The “sides” are the LGBT community and those that hate them.
This is wrong. The person who took Northumbria Police to court was a lesbian and hence a member of the LGBT community. It doesn’t make sense for the “sides” to include the LGBT community.
You’re conflating the gender supporting (as oppose to gender critical) community and the LGBT community.
- Comment on BBC News - BBC senior staff told to 'step back' from duties following row 2 weeks ago:
Finding the actual records/videos is not trivial, which is why I’m asking if anyone has already done that and can provide links.
- Comment on Labour plans further Right to Buy restrictions 2 weeks ago:
Actions speak louder than words.
- Comment on BBC News - BBC senior staff told to 'step back' from duties following row 3 weeks ago:
we heard in the House the absolute shocking stories of the impact this has had on the Jewish community
Very curious what these stories were. Anyone have any links to how Bob Vylan’s set impacted the Jewish community?
- Comment on Why, just why? 3 weeks ago:
If you just click on the “More details” button your question is answered explicitly:
I believe that such provisions may inadvertently incentivise illegal migration, particularly via the English Channel.
- Comment on Angela Rayner: I’ve taken all sorts — but we won’t legalise cannabis 4 weeks ago:
There are a whole bunch of clinics. It’s not infeasible that an entire town has switched although probably unlikely, alas.
- Comment on Angela Rayner: I’ve taken all sorts — but we won’t legalise cannabis 4 weeks ago:
You realise it’s legal to use cannabis in the UK with a prescription? Cannabis was rescheduled in 2018.
- Comment on Angela Rayner: I’ve taken all sorts — but we won’t legalise cannabis 4 weeks ago:
to begin fixing the country?
The country only appears in need of fixing from the perspective of those without money or power. That is, you and me. From the perspective of the people running the country, who have both money and power, the country is working fine and there’s nothing that needs fixing.
- Comment on So true 5 weeks ago:
LOL
- Comment on So true 5 weeks ago:
Not true
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 5 weeks ago:
You seem to think he’s still sitting there and the police are still beating him
What makes you think that?
After I pointed that he was pulled to the ground when he tried to get up and walk away, you said:
Now they should have given him a chance to walk away again but that isn’t a requirement.
So clearly you’re agreeing that they wouldn’t let him leave. Then you said:
They didn’t prevent him from leaving.
But a police officer clearly pulls him back down on to the ground after he gets up to leave. That officer prevented him from leaving. Your statement “they didn’t prevent him from leaving” was false. A police officer preventing the man from leaving is an evet that occurred. It’a shown in the video. I don’t understand why you can’t accept that what you said was wrong. You’re acting like a child.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 5 weeks ago:
The horse is right in the center, at the end of where the fire lands.
I can see a horse outside the trees in line with the line of fire but what makes you think that horse was the target?
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
If you have to ask other people whether you should be a doctor, you should not be a doctor.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
I wasn’t wrong
You said they didn’t prevent him from leaving when they did prevent him from leaving. You were wrong.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
No word confused me, I just wondered why you changed the subject away from you being wrong.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
Eh?
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
They didn’t prevent him from leaving.
As I already pointed out, they did prevent him from leaving. He got up and started to move and then a police officer forcefully pulled him back on to the ground.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
Is it pixelated for you or something?
No.
It’s pretty visible on my end.
I asked you to show me where and you gaslighted me.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
LOL you’re gaslighting me. I just said I can’t see what they’re throwing at and you responded by telling me I can clearly see what they’re throwing at.
I’ll repeat myself: I cannot clearly see what they’re throwing the fire at.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
have the right is a reason to hit someone
Why is having a right to hit someone a reason to hit them?
Now they should have given him a chance to walk away again but that isn’t a requirement. They can keep hitting him till he leaves.
So you’re saying the police have the right to hit whoever they like for as long as they like, all they have to do is prevent them from leaving the area? That’s crazy.
If they have the to use force, they can and will.
The point is that they didn’t need to use force in this instance.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
In the first second, someone tries to throw burning gasoline on a horse.
I don’t see where that’s happening. All I see is a line of fire appearing underneath some trees’ canopy. I can see neither who throws it, how, nor what they’re throwing it at; the canopy obscures everything.
Are you claiming you can see what they’re throwing it at? If so, could you take a screenshot and highlight the target?
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
They hit him because he’s behind the line.
I don’t understand what line you’re referring to.
By law they can use force to compel him to move.
But he got up and started to move and then yet another police officer forcefully pulled him back on to the ground. What you’re saying doesn’t make sense.
In layman’s terms, they can hit you until you leave the area.
Having the right to hit someone isn’t a reason to hit someone. The police officer who hit the citizen with a long stick had no apparent reason to hit him.
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
Could you provide any sources to back up anything you’ve said here?
- Comment on LA rioters tried to set fire to horses 1 month ago:
I didn’t see anyone trying to set fire to horses in this video. I did see a police horse trample a defenceless citizen who was clearly and justifiably frightened and displaying no threatening behaviour and subsequently a police officer hit the same non-threatening citizen with a long stick.
- Comment on Leaked reports confirm LA Mayor Karen Bass ordered LAPD to stand down, blocking aid to federal officers during riots. 1 month ago:
Well done Karen Bass