marauding_gibberish142
@marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on Elon Musk’s X has a new owner—Elon Musk’s xAI 22 hours ago:
Well if I could get a twitter API to abuse for free, I’d compete with him to create automated shitposts. Not going to pay for it though
- Comment on H&M to use digital clones of models in ads and social media 3 days ago:
I’m loving your commentary on the subject.
When I mentioned Mistral, I meant their attention to open source. Their new model (Mistral small) can be run on consumer hardware with similar results to ChatGPT if trained on good data. AI isn’t that useful outside of me asking it to write one-liners but I haven’t had the experience you have.
- Comment on H&M to use digital clones of models in ads and social media 3 days ago:
How much VC/Microsoft funding does OpenAI have? Surely they can’t afford to keep burning cash like they are now? When will they make AI so expensive to use that it will become useless?
The only AI startup I care about is Mistral. Amazing models, altruistic attitude towards AI and software. In my opinion, one of the few great companies out there. Give them a few more years and I’ll consider them in the same league as Mullvad.
- Comment on H&M to use digital clones of models in ads and social media 3 days ago:
I’ve seen this movie before. MBAs are fucking idiots.
Truer words have never been spoken.
- Comment on H&M to use digital clones of models in ads and social media 3 days ago:
I’m just waiting for OpenAI or someone else to jack up prices in the name of profits so high that they will be the equivalent of Nvidia for business AI.
Suddenly hiring for creative roles will be back in full swing because companies won’t be able to afford it. Unfortunately, in the end, the shareholder always wins
- Comment on YouTube cracks down (again) on ad blockers. 3 days ago:
I’m on Debian. Which RSS reader do you use? Is there a fuzzy search for YouTube?
- Comment on AI companies should be charged percentages of their net worth for infringements 3 days ago:
I honestly don’t think EU and Asian leaders have the balls to do this (because the American government will support American companies if it comes down to it)
- Comment on AI companies should be charged percentages of their net worth for infringements 3 days ago:
Malicious delays should be recognised and interest should be charged as an additional percentage
- Comment on YouTube cracks down (again) on ad blockers. 3 days ago:
Can you explain your setup? I’m interested
- Comment on Cloudflare turns AI against itself with endless maze of irrelevant facts 3 days ago:
Companies like this need to be criminally charged, but we know that’s not going to happen
- Comment on Cloudflare turns AI against itself with endless maze of irrelevant facts 3 days ago:
Which boycott? Random Joe over there is handing over his SSN to ChatGPT no problem
- Comment on AI companies should be charged percentages of their net worth for infringements 3 days ago:
Agreed. I wonder if they are just too scared to actually do this
- Submitted 3 days ago to technology@beehaw.org | 9 comments
- Comment on OpenAI's viral Studio Ghibli moment highlights AI copyright concerns 3 days ago:
AI companies should be fine percentages of their total worth by the government whose artists they are taking advantage of. For example: Japanese government penalises OpenAI 50% of their network for every image which is even marginally similar to any publishing house in Japan. And they should be very lenient about taking on these cases.
I want OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Facebook and IBM to get fucked so bad they won’t even dream of coming back and doing this. I don’t know why the EU penalises these companies in monetary amounts. They should be putting rules like a certain percentage of your company for a certain type of wrongdoing.
TBH if Japan or other asian countries bleed these companies dry they will be sitting on an immense sum of money which will propel them to superpowers in their own right. It’s a win-win for everyone