EABOD25
@EABOD25@lemm.ee
- Comment on Why is Trump orange? 1 week ago:
Spray tan
- Comment on Anon's first time 1 week ago:
That’s worse for ball cancer survivors
- Comment on Anon's first time 1 week ago:
Was always a squidward fan
- Comment on Spin-off coming in 2025 1 week ago:
- Comment on Anon's first time 1 week ago:
This is yellow text
- Comment on Indian start-up Yes Madam fires employees who indicated being stressed in the survey 1 week ago:
Well, that is going to backfire because they just made all new stress for the current employees
- Comment on Hot take 2 weeks ago:
Seeing people shouldn’t wear glasses
- Comment on PSA before one freezes 3 weeks ago:
Colonel. What’s a Russian gun ship doing here!?
- Comment on Is there a way to promote a community you create without stepping on toes? 3 weeks ago:
lemm.ee/c/DataBackRibs I’m trying to make a community where people can be open with data and findings, have a respectful discussion, and then both parties “Walk away” with better knowledge while not getting that social media ego. I hope that makes sense
- Comment on Is there a way to promote a community you create without stepping on toes? 3 weeks ago:
Well, if that’s the case, then I have a community called “DataBackRibs” that would definitely appreciate you specific data about ducks and mallards
- Comment on Is there a way to promote a community you create without stepping on toes? 3 weeks ago:
That’s a good one. I’m gonna try that
- Comment on Is there a way to promote a community you create without stepping on toes? 3 weeks ago:
Exactly what I’m looking for. Thank You!
- Comment on Is there a way to promote a community you create without stepping on toes? 3 weeks ago:
What do you mean?
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to [deleted] | 17 comments
- Comment on Microsoft have blocked their own Windows 11 update after it started breaking Ubisoft games 3 weeks ago:
It broke a bunch of shit. I updated and suddenly I started running out of VRAM. Had to restore the previous version to fix it
- Comment on How do you go about evaluating sources of information for truth/credibility/etc.? 4 weeks ago:
Experience of credibility with a source. If you know a news site is credible, then it’s appropriate to trust at least most things.
If it’s a journal or a blog, then it’s most likely opinion with no real substantial evidence.
Experience of the writer of the source. A lot of official articles will have a small bio about the writer or at least their name so you can research the writer.
Citations. That’s all on that point
Site security. If it’s an unsecured site, then it is not a good source of information
Verbiage. If bias or insulting language is being used, then it’s a bias source which makes it a bad source.
- Comment on Is there a way to exclude topics from what I see on Lemmy? 5 weeks ago:
Nope. We are everywhere. We’re in your home, your car, your job, your economy. We are many for We are Legion
- Submitted 5 weeks ago to [deleted] | 9 comments
- Comment on In the US, what is stopping people from bribing members of the electoral college? 5 weeks ago:
The popular vote be damned
- Comment on The chances aren't zero 5 weeks ago:
Either way, from our perspective, the universal is going to kill everything it’s creating
- Comment on The chances aren't zero 5 weeks ago:
Just wait until you hear about The Big Crunch
- Comment on if you workout and run, would you recommend a merino wool base or mid layer for autumn/winter? or am I going to break it? 5 weeks ago:
I don’t run and would still never advise wool
- Comment on Witch hunting is going to quickly destroy Lemmy, and prevent it from flourishing 5 weeks ago:
Lol. I don’t think this is helping tbh
- Comment on Witch hunting is going to quickly destroy Lemmy, and prevent it from flourishing 5 weeks ago:
Ok. So first, I didn’t see anything insulting you or trying to really alienate you in any way. They were just disagreeing with you. Some people are going to say something unnecessary shit, because hell, we all do it, but nothing appears to be a witch hunt. Just expressing in detail why they thought you are wrong. That’s what open discourse is for. If they were trying to witch hunt, then they’d be trying to shut your posts or comments down and make you look like you are a problem. They aren’t doing that. Just saying you’re wrong.
And if I missed direct insults or insulting wording, point it out, but my initial analysis is you’re being dramatic
- Comment on So this is how liberty dies... 1 month ago:
Snorlax is the champ
- Comment on When was the last time a Republican Oresident left office with a good economy? 1 month ago:
Trump’s 1st term was pretty much Reagan 2.0. If he’s going to stay with that theme, this term will be Bush (Sr.) 2.0
- Comment on When was the last time a Republican Oresident left office with a good economy? 1 month ago:
Nixon actual had the highest GDP growth with 3.5%. Second was Reagan at 3.48%
- Comment on So this is how liberty dies... 1 month ago:
Porygon is like the worst pokemon
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Superiority complexes, hero complexes, tribalism, religion, influencers, up-bringing, predisposition…
- Comment on I keep hearing that the Democratic Party should've paid more attention to the young white American demographic. Does this mean there was a point to the "All lives matter." movement? 1 month ago:
Yes. It’s a very wrong perspective.
So let me break it down, and I’m not trying to be alienating or picking a side in the arguments of sex, gender, or color.
In the US, at least, it’s very close enough to say that it’s a half split on biologically born male and female.
Around 25% of those people identify to associate with the LGBTQIA+ group.
Around 32% of Americans are black
19% are Hispanic
7% are asian
And I’m adding this for effect: 58% are european
Now! If we look at the multiple demographic and ethnic ideas and peoples, then we see a different perspective, idea, and solutions.
I didn’t even mention religious or political ideologies, which would make the breakdown even deeper.
My point is that “who we fight for” is not a thing that we can identify with our eyes anymore. We should fight for affection and life. The hardest part is seeing people oppose what looks like who we/what concern ourselves with. That should tell you that not everyone who looks like the person who opposes you might not be your enemy. We have seen what happens when fear and hate control our emotions. Yet very few people want to do anything about it