shy_mia
@shy_mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on Fields of Mistria is one of the most impressive games I've ever played 3 weeks ago:
Very mature
- Comment on Fields of Mistria is one of the most impressive games I've ever played 4 weeks ago:
Yours is a flawed, extremist view.
How impressive something is has nothing to do with whether or not its source is available. What, if they release it to the public it suddenly becomes impressive?
You can disagree with the method of distribution, but it doesn’t affect the quality of the game.Piracy being a thing isn’t a strong argument for open sourcing everything, since the barrier of entry is higher than you may expect for non technical people, a barrier that would definitely be lower if any game was freely available and compilable by anyone. Someone will make a free, one click installer, guaranteed.
Now, can you charge for open source software? Definitely.
Will it generate significant revenue in most circumstances? No.Open source software relies on two methods for funding:
- People’s good will, through donations
- Paid enterprise licenses and training
The former isn’t something one can stably rely on, the latter just isn’t applicable to games.
Again, that model can work for some high profile projects, buu in the vast majority of cases, it won’t. Especially not for games.One can make works of passion and still want to be compensated, that’s what artists do and games are a form of art. You clearly never had to put food on the table with the art you make.
Your vision of everything being open source is a utopia. A noble idea, for sure, but reality is a cruel mistress.
- Comment on Fields of Mistria is one of the most impressive games I've ever played 4 weeks ago:
Just open sourcing the actual engine wouldn’t do much. At best, you’d be able to make it work on newer hardware if problems arise, or port it to other OSs. Great stuff, but not enough when it comes to improving the game, preserving multiplayer, and so on.
There’s a great amount of scaffolding on top of the base engine that any moderately sized game implements, be it through scripting or native code. That’s what I meant by the line between the engine and the game being blurry. If you want to make meaningful changes to the game, you need access to that framework portion, but releasing it would allow for easy reverse engineering of everything else. It’s a difficult balance to achieve.
- Comment on Fields of Mistria is one of the most impressive games I've ever played 4 weeks ago:
I could see that being a thing, but the line between the engine and the game itself is a bit blurry in this context. Copyrighting just the assets and content would often not be enough. There will always be a good chunk of game code which isn’t strictly part of the engine but under this model should remain closed source, otherwise people could just bring their own assets.
Frankly I’d be satisfied with companies open sourcing their games after they stop supporting and/or selling them, mostly for preservation and all that. I think that would be a great middle-ground.
- Comment on Fields of Mistria is one of the most impressive games I've ever played 4 weeks ago:
Ah yes, closed source, such a dealbreaker, as if 99% of other games weren’t.
Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against open source games, it’s just not a viable monetization strategy for most projects, and people gotta eat. There’s reason why most open source games are either passion projects or old games that have been open sourced simply as an act of kindness towards the community since they generate pretty much no revenue.
- Comment on P.E.N.I.S. 2 months ago:
Especially considering what the context already was
- Comment on 8 Minutes 2 months ago:
The moon would disappear though, so you’d notice by looking at the sky if it wasn’t obstructed by clouds.
- Comment on Coming down your chimney 3 months ago:
You didn’t need to post this.
- Comment on I too love watching CP 😍 3 months ago:
Oh dear… that was an unfortunate oversight… blobcat, sweat